FDA approval summary: temsirolimus as treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma

VE Kwitkowski, TM Prowell, A Ibrahim, AT Farrell… - The …, 2010 - academic.oup.com
VE Kwitkowski, TM Prowell, A Ibrahim, AT Farrell, R Justice, SS Mitchell, R Sridhara…
The oncologist, 2010academic.oup.com
Abstract Learning Objectives After completing this course, the reader will be able to:
Compare temsirolimus with IFN-α for the treatment of adults with treatment-naïve, advanced,
poor-prognosis RCC and discuss the differences in OS time and PFS time for each.
Enumerate the laboratory parameters that should be monitored at baseline and while
patients are receiving temsirolimus and implement appropriate laboratory monitoring
procedures. This article is available for continuing medical education credit at CME …
Learning Objectives
After completing this course, the reader will be able to:
  • Compare temsirolimus with IFN-α for the treatment of adults with treatment-naïve, advanced, poor-prognosis RCC and discuss the differences in OS time and PFS time for each.
  • Enumerate the laboratory parameters that should be monitored at baseline and while patients are receiving temsirolimus and implement appropriate laboratory monitoring procedures.
This article is available for continuing medical education credit at CME.TheOncologist.com
This report summarizes the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)'s approval of temsirolimus (Torisel®), on May 30, 2007, for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Information provided includes regulatory history, study design, study results, and literature review.
A multicenter, three-arm, randomized, open-label study was conducted in previously untreated patients with poor-prognosis, advanced RCC. The study objectives were to compare overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, and safety in patients receiving interferon (IFN)-α versus those receiving temsirolimus alone or in combination with IFN-α.
In the second planned interim analysis of the intent-to-treat population (n = 626), there was a statistically significant longer OS time in the temsirolimus (25 mg) arm than in the IFN-α arm (median, 10.9 months versus 7.3 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; p = .0078). The combination of temsirolimus (15 mg) and IFN-α did not lead to a significant difference in OS compared with IFN-α alone. There was also a statistically significant longer PFS time for the temsirolimus (25 mg) arm than for the IFN-α arm (median, 5.5 months versus 3.1 months; HR, 0.66, p = .0001).
Common adverse reactions reported in patients receiving temsirolimus were rash, asthenia, and mucositis. Common laboratory abnormalities were anemia, hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, and hypertriglyceridemia. Serious but rare cases of interstitial lung disease, bowel perforation, and acute renal failure were observed.
Temsirolimus has demonstrated superiority in terms of OS and PFS over IFN-α and provides an additional treatment option for patients with advanced RCC.
Oxford University Press